tomepnk wrote:Leave this here until tonight, then vote will go live. Let us know if we missed something/things need changing for this round of voting. It speaks for itself that some of these votes invalidate themselves based on other questions. But to get a clear picture, we ask every captain to answer every voting question even if it isn't directly what you would be gunning for as a team. We need to know how majority rolls with a certain issue.
TO BE CLEAR: NO VOTING YET!
Vote Question 1
----------------
A. Alter the current package with the outcomes of the votes below
B. Straight up vote between serbian pack and last years rulespack
Vote Question 2
---------------
A. Play with current rulespack set of maelstrom cards
B. Play with full rulebook set of maelstrom cards
C. Play with current rulespack set of maelstrom cards but add in another set of 1-6 mission objectives, bringing total cards to 24
Vote Question 3
---------------
A. Include the Relic as a mission
B. Do not include the Relic as a mission
Vote Question 4
---------------
A. Use killpoints in every Round
B. Do not use killpoints in every Round
Vote Question 5
---------------
A. Use killpoints in every mission but reduce their weighing factor
B. Use killpoints in every mission but do not reduce their weighing factor - same as last rulespack
C. Use killpoints in some missions and reduce the weighing factor
D. Use killpoints in some missions but do not reduce the weighing factor
- Weighing factor will be discussed and captain concensus will determine final weighing factor if a reduction is in order
Vote Question 6
---------------
A. If Killpoints are used in some but not all missions, include them in 1 of the missions
B. If Killpoints are used in some but not all missions, include them in 2 of the missions
C. If Killpoints are used in some but not all missions, include them in 3 of the missions
D. If Killpoints are used in some but not all missions, include them in 4 of the missions
E. If Killpoints are used in some but not all missions, include them in 5 of the missions
Vote Question 7
---------------
A. Use the Fighter Ace Upgrade from Shield Of Baal
B. Do not use the Fighter Ace Upgrade from Shield Of Baal
Vote Question 8
---------------
A. A Team may only use each formation once in its army lists
B. No further restrictions on formations
Vote Question 9
---------------
A. Play with levels in ruins at the ETC
B. Play without levels in ruins at the ETC
We didnt include a vote to ban Adamantium Lance or restrict characters since it was voted in the first time and not enough hands were raised for a re-vote on the matter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding killpoints and altering them:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Killpoints presently can be won by a maximum of 8 difference, for instance, 10-2. In this instance Player 1 would have won by 8 kill points (the maximum differential). This would produce a differential of +4/-4, so if the game scored a 10-10 prior to calculating killpoints, it would now be a 14-6. If we want to diminish the impact of killpoints, please let us know your ideas to incorporate them into the current scoring system.
Ovo ce biti uskoro stavljeno na glasanje, a kako se mi spremamo kao da cemo ici, mislim da bi bilo dobro da malo prodiskutujemo (ako se ukaze potreba) o pitanjima koja se ovde postavljaju.
Ono kako bih ja, licno, glasao je:
1.
B (s tim da ispravimo ponesto sto se od nas trazi, poput koriscenja samo ETC seta kartica..)
2.
C (smanjuje se "randomness" seta kartica, ali opet, mislim da je ok ukljuciti jos dodatnih 6 kartica kako bi set malo "narastao" i time se smanjilo outdeck-ovanje)
3.
A (trebali bi da igramo SVE misije)
4.
B (preterano je da u svih sest partija budu racunati KP)
5.
D (ako ce to biti jako slicno kao u onom nasem setu misija)
6.
B ili C (jedini razuman broj misija..sve vise od toga je previse)
7. Ovde mi je apsolutno svejedno, s tim da bih glasao za
B cisto da imamo da brinemo o manje stvari (a i reeetko ko to ikada koristi)
8.
A (opet, mnoge imucnije reprezentacije ce izvesti, npr. 2 Lance formacije, a mislim da ne treba da pravimo 2+ anti-IK liste, a mogucnosti da mi izvedemo toliko IK su jako male)
9.
A (tako je po BRB)
Bilo bi dobro kada bi i ostali pogledali ovo i dali neko svoje misljenje/vidjenje kako bismo, kao tim, trebali da glasamo.
Hvala.
"MISSION SUCCESSFUL! Once again, I...Cato Sicarius..."